11/19/2023 0 Comments Site visits to human social centerThis then resulted in a later debate about whether to legalize spaces or not. The differences tended to stem from whether the project was primarily anarchist, autonomist, communist, or without ideology. What linked these political and cultural projects was the fact that they were squatted, their focus on self-management and self-financing, and the use of the space as a social venue for the local community. Two factors which helped the wave spread were the well-publicised eviction resistance (and subsequent resquat) of Leoncavallo in Milan and the Panther student movement. A second wave of social centres began in the late 1980s and early 1990s, with more than 100 projects spread across the country. They often affiliated themselves with Autonomia Operaia (Workers' Autonomy) and suffered when social movements were repressed following the Years of Lead. The social centres in Milan were used for diverse activities such as concerts, films, yoga classes, discussion groups and counselling for drug addicts. Self-managed social centres were first occupied in the mid-1970s in cities such as Milan by groups of young people, both students and unemployed. Over time, some but not all projects have opted to legalize their status. The centres ( Italian: centri sociali) tend to be squatted and provide self-organised, self-financing spaces for alternative and noncommercial activities such as concerts, exhibitions, farmers' markets, infoshops, and migrant initiatives. They are part of different left-wing political networks including anarchist, communist, socialist, and autonomist. Self-managed social centres in Italy exist in many cities. Self-organised autonomous projects in ItalyĪskatasuna social centre in Turin, 2016 Entrance to Zapata social centre in Genoa, 2015
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |